|
| |
| Sonotron Therapy |
| The
Sonotron - A non-invasive therapy device utilizing
low power modulated radio-frequency (RF) and audio energy
in the form of a visible and audible corona discharge beam |
| For Treating |
- Osteoarthritis - Arthrosis
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome
- Temperomandibular Joint
|
- Tendinitis
- Bursitis
- Sports Injuries
- Other Joint Conditions
|
|
This center believes in
a coordinated multidisciplinary approach to treating chronic
pain, offering the best of traditional and holistic medicine
in a caring, supportive atmosphere. The center believes
the patient should participate in designing a treatment
regimen that addresses their problem in the best way possible.
Some of the types of pain treated at this center are: fibromyalgia,
reflex sympathetic dystrophy, arthritis, diabetic neuropathy,
headaches, cancer pain, chronic abdominal or plevic pain,
post amputation pain, failed back surgery syndrome, low
back pain, neck pain, facial pain, post herpetic neuralgia
and TMJ pain.
The specialties that are covered by the staff are anesthesiology,
neurology, psychiatry, psychology, dentistry, hypnotherapy,
biofeedback, acupuncture, massage therapy, shiatso, jin
shin dyutsu, Feldenkreis method, nutrition and stress management.
This center also has its own operating room with C-arm digital
fluoroscopy making it possible for placement of implantable
epidural and spinal narcotic pumps and spinal cord stimulators
without hospital stay.
Because of its central location in the state, the patients
come from northern and southern New Jersey along with eastern
Pennsylvania.
The Center opened its doors in April of '95 under the direction
of Leslie M. Greenberg, MD, founder and director. Dr. Greenberg
is board certified in otolaryngology, and anesthesia. Having
been trained at Harvard Medical School and Brigham Women's
Hospital in Boston, he is also an attending anesthesiologist
at the Medical Center at Princeton.
The Sonotron is operated by the medical staff under AA Northvale
Medical Associates and is supervised by Herb Etzold, a representative
of Sonotron Medical Systems, Inc. |
| Sonotron Patient Treatment Protocol |
All patients who expressed
localized joint pain were treated with the Sonotron. This
was done with the belief that if there was no relief at
their first treatment, another modality was selected.
No x-rays are taken on the premises.
This initial period use of the Sonotron was experimental
to see how patients reacted to this type of therapy - and
also what types of problems can best be treated with the
Sonotron.
Before the use of the Sonotron all patients were evaluated
by an attending physician using the center's pain scale
form. They each were required to read and sign a patient
consent form and the physician signed and filled out the
attending physician statement.
The evaluation form was completed on all patients whether
they had one treatment or multiple treatments |
| Patient Sample |
All patients understood
that they were part of a United States Food and Drug Administration
study. In addition, confidentiality of patient information
and medical history was assured.
All 24 patients are listed with their results from the initial
trial period of six months. |
| Charts |
The patients' range in
age was 18 to 99 years with a median age of 72. The mean
was 6 years younger and the mode was 3 years older than
the median (Chart 1). In the population there were 7 males
and 17 females (Chart 2).
Nine areas of the body were treated (Chart 3). The lower
back (lumbar area) had the highest number of patients. Seven
shoulders were treated for pain, six knees, four hips, four
ankles and one each for hand, upper back, wrist and TMJ.
Out of 24 patients nine had more than one joint treated.
Even though all the patients never completed 3 or 4 treatments,
only 4 had no reduction in pain. Chart 4 illustrates the
difference in patients' pain as recorded in the patient
record. |
| Fact Sheet |
| The Sonotron is a patented
non-invasive medical electronic therapy device used in the
treatment of joint conditions such as osteoarthritis, tendinitis,
bursitis, TMJ and sports related joint injuries. Additional
studies with the Sonotron Device have shown positive results
in treating Carpal Tunnel and Tarsal Tunnel Syndromes. The
Sonotron Device employs modulated low radio frequency (RF)
energy coupled with an audio wave to produce a corona discharge
output. The corona discharge is emitted through a hand held
applicator and is applied in a circular movement directly
over the joint or injured area in the form of treatment
units (TU). The number of Treatment Units administered may
depend on the size of the joint and the degree of inflammation.
Protocols have been established and are listed in the Operator
Guidebook. The exact number of TUs should be determined
by the administering physician. A treatment unit (TU) is
a microprocessor controlled 15 second output of the patented
Corona Discharge. |
| Technical Information |
| Power Requirements |
100,120,220, 240 VAC (+/- 10%), 60 or 50 Hz
5 amps maximum under load |
| Output Frequency |
430 kHz (+/- 3%) |
| Base Unit Dimensions |
Height:
Width:
Depth: |
7 3/4 in.
21 in.
15 in. |
(19.7 cm)
(53.3 cm)
(38.1 cm) |
| Applicator
Dimensions |
Barrel Length:
Barrel Diam:
Handle: |
11 in.
2 7/16 in.
4 1/2 in. |
(27.9 cm)
(6.17 cm)
(11.43 cm) |
|
| Joint Therapy Modality Comparison |
| The Sonotron is a non-invasive
device which uses a corona discharge to treat painful joint
conditions. It employs radio frequency energy of 430 kilohertz
(430,000 cycles per second, long wave) combined with a sound
wave at 1 kilohertz (1,000 cycles per second, audible).
The resulting energy of this combined wave is emitted through
a hand held applicator in the form of a corona discharge.
The output power of the Sonotron is 8 watts and the patient
is exposed to the corona output for short periods of 45
seconds to 3 minutes depending on the size and density of
the joint. After a series of 3 to 5 treatments, patients
have reported pain relief which has lasted for comparatively
long periods, typically averaging 4 to 6 months. There have
been no reported side effects or hazards. |
| RF Diathermy |
| Radio Frequency or RF
Diathermy has been used for decades for treating painful
joint conditions by developing deep heat within tissue.
As its name implies, RF Diathermy creates deep heat in the
body by use of electromagnetic energy which is passed from
a transmitter electrode to a receiving electrode with the
painful body part carefully positioned between these electrodes.
RF Diathermy uses radio waves at 27.12 megahertz (27,120,000
cycles per second) - a microwave frequency. In order to
achieve therapeutic heat levels it requires 300 to 600 watts
of power with the patient exposed for 15 to 45 minutes.
The patient does feel pain relief due to the therapeutic
effects of the heat which is generated in the joint. Typically
the pain relief lasts for several hours and diminishes quickly
as the joint is used and the heat is dissipated. Due to
the power used there is an electrical burn hazard associated
with RF Diathermy which can be caused by improper positioning
of the patient or movement while treating. |
| Ultrasound Diathermy |
| Ultrasound Diathermy ("UD")
is also a deep heat modality. Through vibrations developed
by sound waves emitted by the UD device, heat is developed
by the frictional vibration effect of cellular tissue movement.
The UD device is administered to the patient by first applying
gel to the area to be treated and then pressing a sound
transducer to the area. The sound waves are passed into
the body to cause vibration of the tissues to create heat.
In order to be effective, the patient must be exposed to
the sound waves for 15 to 60 minutes and the application
must be performed by a trained technician to insure that
proper contact is achieved. Although UD does create deep
heat it is not as efficient in the depth to which the heat
can penetrate due to the resistive and dissipative effect
of the volume and density of tissue. The patient does feel
pain relief due to the therapeutic effect of the heat which
is developed in the joint. Typically the relief lasts for
several hours and diminishes quickly as the joint is used
and the heat is dissipated. |
Cold Laser Therapy
| Cold Laser Therapy ("CLD")
is actually a misnomer due to the fact that the output of
these devices is not actually cold but is at a much reduced
level than those lasers used for cutting or burning. CLD
is used for treating joint pain by exposing the area to
be treated with high intensity laser light which penetrates
deeply within tissue to achieve therapeutic heat. There
has also been research and theories developed regarding
the hypothesis that CLD does not rely solely on the heat
generated by the laser but also has a cellular effect. However,
no definitive results have been achieved to substantiate
this theory. Patients that respond to CLD therapy do experience
pain relief for short periods. Certain patients have experienced
negative effects such as burns to certain laser frequencies.
|
| |
| Modality Comparison Chart |
| Modality |
Power |
Time Applied |
Duration of
Relief |
Hazards |
| |
8 watts |
.75 to 3 minutes |
months |
none |
| RF Diathermy |
300 to 600
watts |
15 to 45 minutes |
hours |
electrical
burns |
| Ultrasound Diath. |
100 to 500
watts |
15 to 60 minutes |
hours |
none |
| Cold Laser |
NA |
1 to 5 minutes |
days |
tissue burns |
|
| The Sonotron is a non-invasive
device that employs modulated radio-frequency (RF) energy
in the form of a visible and audible corona discharge beam
emanating from a discharge electrode. The device is operated
from 100,110, 220 or 240 VAC at 50 or 60 Hz power. The source
of energy is an RF generator set at 8 watts with a carrier
frequency approximately 430,000 Hz. It utilizes electromagnetic
energy modulated at a lower frequency in the audio range
of 1,000 Hz. The discharge electrode is recessed within
a plastic, heat resistant polycarbonate housing (the Applicator)
to assure that the electrode remains at a constant preset
distant from the skin. It is to be employed as a therapeutic
device that utilizes radio-frequency energy transmitted
through the air directly to the skin for treating joint
conditions and the newest findings show positive results
in the treatment of Carpal Tunnel and Tarsal Tunnel Syndromes.
|
| Safety Studies |
| Tests have been conducted
by the Biomedical Engineering Staff of the Instrumentation
Systems Center in the College of Engineering of the University
of Wisconsin at Madison, to quantify and classify the output
signals of the Sonotron Device.
Output signals were found to resemble the frequency spectra
of electrosurgical units, but with approximately 1/60th
the current and power. The amount of power dissipated within
the tissue was smaller, similar in magnitude to the power
of a pocket calculator. Scientific literature indicates
that this level is at or below the threshold of perception
and small enough to preclude a burn hazard even in the event
of an inadvertent ground contact.
Based on these data, it was determined that the Sonotron
should be regarded as a non-significant risk device. This
conclusion is based upon: a.) comparison of the device to
other electro-medical devices presently in use with similar
frequency content, and b.) literature reports on the effects
of high frequency currents on human tissue.
|
| Clinical Studies |
| Two separate double blind
clinical studies were performed at the University of Wisconsin.
The first study was an evaluation of Sonotron therapy in
the treatment of experimentally induced arthritis in the
horse. This was performed at the University of Wisconsin
School of Veterinary Medicine in Madison, Wisconsin. A group
of thirty-five experimental ponies were used in the first
study. These adult ponies were in good physical condition
and without any observable lameness. The left and right
middle carpal joints were evaluated by x-ray and synovial
fluid analysis to verify that there was no evidence of arthritis
within these joints prior to the study. The ponies were
then divided into two groups. One group served as the control
group and the other served as principals and were treated
with varying levels of Sonotron therapy.
A model of degenerative joint disease was created by injecting
10 mg. Of Amphotericin B in the left middle carpal joint.
This has been shown to produce a predictable synovitis in
ponies analogous to the synovitis seen in osteoarthritis.
After lameness was induced in all ponies with the injection
of Amphotericin B into the left midcarpal joint, serial
x-rays, joint swelling, range of motion and gait analysis
were evaluated by a qualified expert in a double blind fashion
on a weekly to bi-weekly basis until the conclusion of the
clinical study.
At the end of the study, pathological specimens of the middle
carpal joints were collected for gross and microscopic evaluation.
The degree of degenerative and inflammatory changes was
assessed by a board certified pathologist who had no knowledge
of the treatment groups. The conclusion of the study indicated
that Sonotron therapy had a significant effect in reducing
the level of lameness in ponies with experimentally induced
arthritis. Additionally, there was a significant reduction
in the severity of gross pathological lesions, as well as
joint swelling. Also noted was a marked increase in joint
range motion, and improved gait, as recorded on video tape.
No harmful effects to the skin and no indication of pain
were associated with the study. The study did not detect
any harmful or negative effects from the use of Sonotron
therapy during the entire period of study.
The second study was monitored by the University of Wisconsin-Madison
Instrumentation Systems Center and was conducted at 5 geographically
dispersed locations in the United States. This consisted
of a multicenter short term single administration double
blind randomized placebo control study of the efficacy and
safety of Sonotron in the treatment of pain in human subjects
with osteoarthritis of the knee. The evaluation protocol
included an overall assessment of pain by the patient at
rest, on a passive motion of the affected joint, and on
weight bearing. Tenderness in the involved joint was assessed
on a scale of zero to three. Other parameters included improvement
of range of motion during treatment, improvement in fifty
foot walking time, as well as global evaluation of patient
response by patient and investigator.
The study was conducted at five regional centers on a population
of ninety-eight human subjects. Data was analyzed by Chi-Squared
analysis on eleven non-parametric measures to compare the
relative responses of the randomly assigned control and
treated sub-population. Two data sets showed a high probability
(.001) that the subject's assessment of pain one week after
administration was reduced in the treated, relative to the
untreated control sub-population. These measures were knee
joint pain on passive motion and knee joint pain at rest.
Other data indicated a trend of improvement one week after
a single administration in the treated group as compared
to the untreated group. These measures were global evaluations
by the investigator and knee joint pain on weight bearing.
None of the ninety-eight subjects in the study reported
adverse reactions to administration of Sonotron therapy
which the investigators deemed significant or long lasting.
Additional studies have been conducted with the Sonotron
Device. The newest studies completed showed positive results
in the treatment of Carpal and Tarsal Tunnel Syndromes.
If you are interested in learning more about the positive
effects of Sonotron therapy please contact Michael Clark,
International Marketing Representative. |
| |
|
|